Artikel ; Online: Development and Validation of the First Smart TV-Based Visual Acuity Test
Healthcare, Vol 10, Iss 2117, p
A Prospective Study
2022 Band 2117
Abstract: 1) Background: While smartphones are among the primary devices used in telemedical applications, smart TV healthcare apps are not prevalent despite smart TVs’ penetrance in home settings. The present study’s objective was to develop and validate the ... ...
| Abstract | (1) Background: While smartphones are among the primary devices used in telemedical applications, smart TV healthcare apps are not prevalent despite smart TVs’ penetrance in home settings. The present study’s objective was to develop and validate the first smart TV-based visual acuity (VA) test (Democritus Digital Visual Acuity Test (DDiVAT)) that allows a reliable VA self-assessment. (2) Methods: This is a prospective validation study. DDiVAT introduces several advanced features for reliable VA self-testing; among them: automatic calibration, voice recognition, voice guidance, automatic calculation of VA indexes, and a smart TV-based messaging system. Normal and low vision participants were included in the validation. DDiVAT VA results (VA DDiVAT ) were compared against the ones from: (a) the gold-standard conventional ETDRS (VA ETDRS ), and, (b) an independent ophthalmologist who monitored the self-examination testing (VA RES ). Comparisons were performed by noninferiority test (set at 2.5-letters) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). DDiVAT’s test-retest reliability was assessed within a 15-day time-window. (3) Results: A total of 300 participants (185 and 115 with normal and low vision, respectively) responded to ETDRS and DDiVAT. Mean difference in letters was −0.05 for VA ETDRS –VA RES , 0.62 for VA RES –VA DDiVAT , and 0.67 for VA ETDRS –VA DDiVAT , significantly lower than the 2.5 letter noninferiority margin. ICCs indicated an excellent level of agreement, collectively and for each group (0.922-0.996). All displayed letters in DDiVAT presented a similar difficulty. The overall accuracy of the voice recognition service was 96.01%. ICC for VA DDiVAT test-retest was 0.957. (4) Conclusions: The proposed DDiVAT presented non-significant VA differences with the ETDRS, suggesting that it can be used for accurate VA self-assessment in telemedical settings, both for normal and low-vision patients. |
|---|---|
| Schlagwörter | visual acuity test ; smart TV ; smartphone ; home ; validation ; telemedicine ; Medicine ; R |
| Thema/Rubrik (Code) | 150 |
| Sprache | Englisch |
| Erscheinungsdatum | 2022-10-01T00:00:00Z |
| Verlag | MDPI AG |
| Dokumenttyp | Artikel ; Online |
| Datenquelle | BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (Lebenswissenschaftliche Auswahl) |
Volltext online
Zusatzmaterialien
Kategorien
Fernleihe an ZB MED
Sie können sich den gewünschten Titel als lokale Nutzerin oder lokaler Nutzer von ZB MED direkt an den Standort Köln schicken lassen.